UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-5151
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
Incorporated in State of Minnesota |
42-0442319 |
|
(State or other Jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Identification No.) |
3400 JACKSON STREET
DUBUQUE, IOWA 52004-0877
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(563) 556-7730
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x. No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
Yes o |
No x |
|
Common Stock - $1.00 Par Value |
|
|
Shares Outstanding as of March 31, 2009 |
6,575,633 |
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
2,379,687 |
|
$ |
2,841,323 |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,160,066 |
|
|
Trade receivables – less allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
32,176,888 |
|
|
43,783,224 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
76,699,397 |
|
|
85,791,400 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,920,000 |
|
|
4,210,000 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,245,130 |
|
|
2,853,634 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
119,421,102 |
|
|
140,639,647 |
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
23,885,251 |
|
|
26,372,392 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,595,187 |
|
|
1,392,187 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,199,719 |
|
|
11,501,992 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
155,101,259 |
|
$ |
179,906,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable – trade |
|
$ |
10,765,295 |
|
$ |
14,580,275 |
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
5,142,945 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll and related items |
|
|
5,742,595 |
|
|
6,759,941 |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
6,516,789 |
|
|
7,176,799 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
4,552,517 |
|
|
6,059,575 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
31,577,196 |
|
|
39,719,535 |
|
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
20,810,597 |
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
5,051,141 |
|
|
5,343,545 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,310,561 |
|
|
1,280,154 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
47,938,898 |
|
|
67,153,831 |
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative preferred stock – $50 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undesignated (subordinated) stock – $1 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock – $1 par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares; |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,369,996 |
|
|
4,255,996 |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
97,346,180 |
|
|
101,692,431 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(1,129,448 |
) |
|
228,327 |
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
|
107,162,361 |
|
|
112,752,387 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
155,101,259 |
|
$ |
179,906,218 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||||
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
73,626,704 |
|
$ |
98,138,372 |
|
$ |
249,593,317 |
|
$ |
305,024,720 |
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
(61,458,764 |
) |
|
(80,119,291 |
) |
|
(204,157,953 |
) |
|
(245,172,530 |
) |
|
GROSS MARGIN |
|
|
12,167,940 |
|
|
18,019,081 |
|
|
45,435,364 |
|
|
59,852,190 |
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE |
|
|
(14,459,001 |
) |
|
(16,486,183 |
) |
|
(46,622,292 |
) |
|
(52,867,477 |
) |
|
FACILITY CONSOLIDATION AND OTHER CHARGES |
|
|
(528,998 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(2,381,195 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
(2,820,059 |
) |
|
1,532,898 |
|
|
(3,568,123 |
) |
|
6,984,713 |
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
76,442 |
|
|
108,361 |
|
|
688,985 |
|
|
329,323 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(190,810 |
) |
|
(341,728 |
) |
|
(748,667 |
) |
|
(1,183,678 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
(114,368 |
) |
|
(233,367 |
) |
|
(59,682 |
) |
|
(854,355 |
) |
|
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(2,934,427 |
) |
|
1,299,531 |
|
|
(3,627,805 |
) |
|
6,130,358 |
|
|
BENEFIT FROM (PROVISION FOR) INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,080,000 |
|
|
(450,000 |
) |
|
1,320,000 |
|
|
(2,230,000 |
) |
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(1,854,427 |
) |
$ |
849,531 |
|
$ |
(2,307,805 |
) |
$ |
3,900,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,573,454 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,615,678 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,612,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2,307,805 |
) |
$ |
3,900,358 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,846,232 |
|
|
3,404,290 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
186,000 |
|
|
Gain on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
(227,252 |
) |
|
(43,301 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(462,473 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
137,638 |
|
|
— |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(335,770 |
) |
|
240,301 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
11,606,336 |
|
|
15,672,992 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
9,092,003 |
|
|
(5,866,734 |
) |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(129,655 |
) |
|
(385,773 |
) |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(10,893 |
) |
|
(29,669 |
) |
|
Accounts payable – trade |
|
|
(3,818,070 |
) |
|
(4,088,320 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(3,184,414 |
) |
|
(1,447,946 |
) |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
(77,939 |
) |
|
10,000 |
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(292,404 |
) |
|
(137,991 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12,949,534 |
|
|
11,414,207 |
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(436,102 |
) |
|
(508,145 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
1,278,927 |
|
|
619,899 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of capital assets |
|
|
651,359 |
|
|
63,022 |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(913,366 |
) |
|
(998,895 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
580,818 |
|
|
(824,119 |
) |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
(1,142,945 |
) |
|
(5,529,271 |
) |
|
Payment of long-term borrowings |
|
|
(10,810,597 |
) |
|
(372,795 |
) |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,038,446 |
) |
|
(2,563,046 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
61,706 |
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(13,991,988 |
) |
|
(8,403,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(461,636 |
) |
|
2,186,682 |
|
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
2,841,323 |
|
|
900,326 |
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
2,379,687 |
|
$ |
3,087,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION – Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||
|
Interest |
|
$ |
758,000 |
|
$ |
1,194,000 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
176,000 |
|
$ |
2,319,000 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
|
1. |
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Flexsteel”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information furnished in the consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of such consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. Except to the extent updated or described below, the significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of accounting policies and are incorporated by reference. |
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS – Flexsteel was incorporated in 1929 and is one of the oldest and largest manufacturers, importers and marketers of residential, recreational vehicle and commercial upholstered and wooden furniture products in the country. Product offerings include a wide variety of upholstered and wood furniture such as sofas, loveseats, chairs, reclining and rocker-reclining chairs, swivel rockers, sofa beds, convertible bedding units, occasional tables, desks, dining tables and chairs and bedroom furniture. The Company’s products are intended for use in home, office, motor home, travel trailer, yacht, pontoon, health care and hotel applications. Featured as a basic component in most of the upholstered furniture is a unique steel drop-in seat spring from which our name “Flexsteel” is derived. The Company distributes its products throughout the United States through the Company’s sales force and various independent representatives to furniture dealers, department stores, recreational vehicle manufacturers, catalogs, hospitality and healthcare facilities. The Company’s products are also sold to several national and regional chains, some of which sell on a private label basis.
The Company has one active wholly-owned subsidiary, DMI Furniture, Inc. (“DMI”), which is a Louisville, Kentucky-based, manufacturer, importer and marketer of residential and commercial office furniture with a manufacturing plant and warehouses in Indiana and manufacturing sources in Asia. DMI’s divisions are WYNWOOD, Homestyles and DMI Commercial Office Furniture. The Company has two inactive wholly owned subsidiaries: (1) Desert Dreams, Inc. and (2) Four Seasons, Inc.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS – The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, subject to the deferral provisions of FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effect Date of FASB Statement No. 157, as of July 1, 2008. SFAS 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. This enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories: Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data; or Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
|
2. |
INVENTORIES – The Company values inventory at the lower of cost or market. Raw steel, lumber and wood frame parts are valued on the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. Other inventories are valued on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Inventories valued on the LIFO method would have been approximately $2.5 million and $3.3 million higher at March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, if they had been valued on the FIFO method. Inventory quantities for steel and wood have been reduced during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. This reduction resulted in a liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases, the effect of which decreased cost of goods sold by approximately |
$0.8 million and decreased net loss by approximately $0.5 million. A comparison of inventories is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
10,659 |
|
$ |
15,272 |
|
|
Work in process and finished parts |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
8,082 |
|
|
Finished goods |
|
|
60,190 |
|
|
62,437 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,699 |
|
$ |
85,791 |
|
|
3. |
BORROWINGS AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS – At March 31, 2009, borrowings and credit arrangements consisted of the following (in thousands): |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight borrowings; interest rate at prime minus 1%; unsecured; |
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$15 million working capital line of credit; expires June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
Overnight borrowings; interest rate at prime; secured |
|
— |
|
|
Short-term line of credit; interest rate at LIBOR + 2.25%; secured |
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.0 million revolving note; expires September 30, 2011; interest rate at LIBOR + 3.00%; secured |
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
$ |
14,000 |
|
The Company has lines of credit of $29.0 million with banks, with borrowings at differing rates based on the date and type of financing utilized.
In March 2009, the Company amended its credit facility agreements with its primary bank reducing its long-term availability from $20.0 million to $10.0 million, shortening the maturity date to September 30, 2011, increasing its short-term facility from $12.0 million to $15.0 million, and extending its short-term facility to June 30, 2010. The Company pledged accounts receivable and inventory as security under the amended credit facility agreements. The amount of credit available to the Company will be based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory as defined in the amended agreements. At March 31, 2009, the Company had available collateral, as defined by the bank, of $52.9 million with borrowing availability of $25.0 million of which $14.0 million was outstanding.
The amended agreements provide short-term working capital financing up to $15.0 million with interest selected at the option of the Company at a Commercial Bank Floating Rate (“CBFR”) which is the prime rate subject to a floor calculation of adjusted one month LIBOR rate (3.25% at March 31, 2009) or LIBOR (0.52% at March 31, 2009) plus 2.25%. At March 31, 2009, $4.0 million was outstanding. The short-term portion also provides overnight credit when required for operations at prime. No amounts were outstanding at March 31, 2009 related to overnight credit. As prescribed by SFAS 157, which is previously discussed in Note 1, the Company recognizes the fair value of the borrowings as a Level 2 valuation.
The long-term portion of the credit facility provides up to $10.0 million and expires September 30, 2011. At March 31, 2009, $10.0 million was outstanding. Variable interest is set monthly at the option of the Company at a CBFR or LIBOR plus 3.0%. All interest rates are adjusted monthly, except for the overnight portion of the short-term line of credit, which varies daily at the prime rate. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has effectively fixed the interest rates at 5.0% on approximately $10.0 million of its long-term debt through the use of interest rate swaps.
The credit agreement contains financial covenants. The primary covenant is an interest coverage ratio. The ratio is computed as net income plus amortization, depreciation, interest expense, income taxes and the aggregate of all expenses related to stock options (“EBITDA”) divided by interest expense, which will vary by quarter over the term of the agreement. At March 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants contained in the credit agreement.
An officer of the Company is a director at a bank where the Company maintains a $4.0 million line of credit, cumulative letter of credit facilities and where its routine daily banking transactions are processed. The Company is contingently liable to insurance carriers under its comprehensive general, product, and vehicle liability policies, as well as some workers’ compensation, and has provided letters of credit in the amount of $4.9 million. The Company receives no special services or pricing on the services performed by the bank due to the directorship of this officer. No amount was outstanding on the line of credit at prime minus 1.0% at March 31, 2009.
The Company had financed the purchase of delivery equipment during fiscal year 2006 through a five-year fixed rate note at 4.99%. The note required payments through December 2010. In March 2009, the Company paid the balance of the notes in full.
|
4. |
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS & HEDGING ACTIVITIES – Related to its variable debt, the Company has interest rate swaps utilized to hedge against adverse changes in interest rates. The notional principal amounts of the outstanding interest rate swaps totaled $10.0 million with a weighted average fixed rate of 5.0% at March 31, 2009. The interest rate swaps are not utilized to take speculative positions. The Board of Directors established the Company’s policies with regard to activities involving derivative instruments. Management, along with the Board of Directors, periodically reviews those policies, along with the actual derivative related results. The Company recorded the fair market value of its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges on its balance sheet and has marked them to fair value through other comprehensive (loss) income. The cumulative fair value of the swaps was a liability of $0.4 million and $0.3 million as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and is reflected as other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2009, all of the derivatives used by the Company in its risk management are highly effective hedges because all of the critical terms of the derivative instruments match those of the hedged item. As prescribed by SFAS 157, which is previously discussed in Note 1, the Company recognizes the fair value of the swap liability as a Level 2 valuation. |
|
5. |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION – The Company has two stock-based compensation methods available when determining employee compensation. |
|
|
(1) |
2007 Long-Term Management Incentive Compensation Plan – The plan provides for shares of common stock and cash to be awarded to officers and key employees based on performance targets set by the Nominating and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The Committee has selected consolidated operating results for organic net sales growth and fully-diluted earnings per share for the two-year transition period beginning July 1, 2007 and ending on June 30, 2009 and the three-year performance periods beginning July 1, 2007 and ending on June 30, 2010 and beginning July 1, 2008 and ending on June 30, 2011. The Committee has also specified that payouts, if any, for awards earned under the fiscal years 2008-2009, 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 performance periods will be 60% stock and 40% cash. Awards will be paid to participants as soon as practicable following the end of the performance periods, verification of results, and subject to the negative discretion of the Committee. As the payouts of these awards are subject to the negative discretion of the Committee the grant date is not established until the awards are paid. Accordingly, compensation cost is re-measured based on the award's estimated fair value at the end of each reporting period prior to the grant date to the extent service has been rendered in comparison to the total requisite service period. Further, the accrual of compensation cost is based on the probable outcomes of the performance conditions. The portion of the accrued award payable in stock is classified within equity and the portion of the accrued award payable in cash is classified within liabilities. |
The fair value of the equity portion of the award is estimated each period based on the market value of the Company’s common shares reduced by the present value of expected dividends to be paid prior to the service period, discounted using a risk-free interest rate. In the period the grant date occurs, cumulative compensation cost will be adjusted to reflect the cumulative effect of measuring compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date. Under the plan the aggregate number of shares and cash that could be awarded to key executives if the target and maximum performance goals are met are as follows:
|
|
|
At Target |
|
At Maximum |
| ||||||||
|
Performance Period |
|
Stock |
|
Cash |
|
Stock |
|
Cash |
| ||||
|
July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2009 |
|
|
22,212 |
|
$ |
210,567 |
|
|
35,544 |
|
$ |
336,820 |
|
|
July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2010 |
|
|
33,330 |
|
$ |
315,881 |
|
|
53,329 |
|
$ |
505,395 |
|
|
July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2011 |
|
|
44,621 |
|
$ |
334,714 |
|
|
71,398 |
|
$ |
535,573 |
|
No compensation costs were accrued at March 31, 2009 or 2008. If the target performance goals would be achieved the total amount of stock compensation cost recognized over the requisite service periods would be $0.6 million per year based on the estimated fair values at March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, 500,000 shares were available for awards.
|
(2) |
Stock Option Plans – The stock option plans for key employees and directors provide for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options. Under the plans, options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant, and may be exercisable for up to 10 years. All options are exercisable when granted. |
In December 2008 and 2007, the Company issued options for 265,000 and 120,000 common shares at weighted average exercise prices of $6.82 and $12.40 (the fair market value on the date of grant), respectively. The options were immediately available for exercise and may be exercised for a period of 10 years. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) the Company recorded compensation expense of $ 0.1 million and $0.2 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The assumptions used in determining the compensation expense are discussed below.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively; dividend yield of 7.6% and 4.2%, expected volatility of 21.8% and 19.5%; risk-free interest rate of 1.6% and 3.3%; and an expected life of 6 and 5 years, respectively. The expected volatility and expected life are determined based on historical data.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $0.45 and $1.63, respectively. The cash proceeds, income tax benefit and aggregate intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the market price of stock on the date of grant) exercised during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were not material.
At March 31, 2009, 145,100 shares were available for future grants. It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares upon exercise of stock options. The Company does not expect to repurchase any shares during fiscal year 2009 related to stock option exercises. The Company accepts shares of the Company’s common stock as payment for the exercise price of options. These shares received as payment are retired upon receipt.
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of March 31, 2009, and the changes from June 30, 2007, are presented below:
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
| ||
|
Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
782,174 |
|
$ |
15.45 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
Granted |
|
120,000 |
|
|
12.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
(3,400 |
) |
|
11.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
(5,790 |
) |
|
16.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2008 |
|
892,984 |
|
|
15.04 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
Granted |
|
265,000 |
|
|
6.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
(36,295 |
) |
|
15.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
1,121,689 |
|
$ |
13.09 |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
The following table summarizes information for options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | ||||
|
Range of |
|
Options |
|
Remaining |
|
Exercise | ||
|
$ |
6.81 – 10.75 |
|
286,050 |
|
9.1 |
|
$ |
7.09 |
|
|
12.35 – 13.59 |
|
295,773 |
|
7.0 |
|
|
12.63 |
|
|
14.40 – 16.52 |
|
401,266 |
|
5.6 |
|
|
15.55 |
|
|
19.21 – 20.27 |
|
138,600 |
|
4.7 |
|
|
19.32 |
|
$ |
6.81 – 20.27 |
|
1,121,689 |
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
13.09 |
|
6. |
INCOME TAXES – In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on the expected annual income (loss), statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to the Company in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. This includes recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns to the extent pervasive evidence exists that they will be realized in future periods. The deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates by tax jurisdiction, based on currently enacted tax laws, which are expected to be in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. In accordance with the Company’s income tax policy, significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur. |
At March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2008, the Company had approximately $0.7 million of gross liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits (composed of $0.5 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits and accrued interest and penalties of $0.2 million) and related deferred tax assets of approximately $0.2 million, all of which would affect our effective tax rate if recognized. The Company does not expect that there will be any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months. The Company records interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. Generally, the tax years 2004–2008 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service or other taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.
|
7. |
LITIGATION – From time to time, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings, including lawsuits, which arise out of, and are incidental to, the conduct of the Company’s business. The Company does not consider any of such proceedings that are currently pending, individually or in the aggregate, to be material to its business or likely to result in a material adverse effect on its consolidated operating results, financial condition, or cash flows. |
|
8. |
EARNINGS PER SHARE – Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares and common equivalent shares. Common equivalent shares represent the effect of stock options during each period presented, which if exercised, would dilute EPS. In computing EPS for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, net (loss) income as reported for each respective period is divided by: |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||||
|
Basic shares outstanding |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,573,454 |
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
— |
|
|
40,045 |
|
|
— |
|
|
38,556 |
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,615,678 |
|
|
6,575,633 |
|
|
6,612,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because the option exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares or the net loss would cause the effect of the options to be anti-dilutive |
|
|
1,121,689 |
|
|
569,201 |
|
|
1,121,689 |
|
|
569,201 |
|
|
9. |
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME – The components of comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes, for the quarters and nine months ended, were as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||||
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,854 |
) |
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
(2,308 |
) |
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income (OCI): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of income taxes of $(30), $104, $47 and $260, respectively |
|
|
55 |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
(63 |
) |
|
(409 |
) |
|
Change in fair value of available-for-sale, securities, net of income taxes of $91, $153, $793 and $54, respectively |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
(250 |
) |
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
(83 |
) |
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
(420 |
) |
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
(492 |
) |
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,947 |
) |
$ |
430 |
|
$ |
(3,666 |
) |
$ |
3,408 |
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
| |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
$ |
975 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
(178 |
) |
|
SFAS No. 158 transition adjustment (actuarial losses) |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
(569 |
) |
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,130 |
) |
$ |
228 |
|
|
10. |
ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS – In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 on July 1, 2008 for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value except for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, as permitted by FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. |
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are effective as of the beginning of the Company’s 2009 fiscal year. The Company chose not to adopt SFAS No. 159.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which require additional disclosure related to derivative instruments and hedging activities. The provisions of SFAS No. 161 are effective as of the beginning of the Company’s 2010 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial statements.
|
11. |
FACILITY CONSOLIDATION AND OTHER CHARGES |
During the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded charges for facility consolidation and related costs of $0.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The charges represent employee separation costs and facility closing costs with no future benefit to the Company. In the process of recording facility consolidation charges, the company reviewed the usefulness and/or ability to sell idle assets at these facilities in order to determine their fair value. Based on this review, the Company recorded an asset impairment of $0.1 million related to machinery and equipment and included it in the “Facility Consolidation and Other Charges” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At March 31, 2009, the remaining accrued costs of $0.2 million relate primarily to employee severance costs and are classified as “Accrued Liabilities: Other” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the facility consolidation and other charges during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
Employee |
|
Facility |
|
Total |
| |||
|
Facility consolidation and other charges for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
Costs incurred during the three months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
Facility consolidation and other charges at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
Costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
— |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
Facility consolidation and other charges at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL:
The following analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, included in our 2008 annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
The following table has been prepared as an aid in understanding the Company’s results of operations on a comparative basis for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Amounts presented are percentages of the Company’s net sales.
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
| ||||
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(83.5 |
) |
|
(81.6 |
) |
|
(81.8 |
) |
|
(80.4 |
) |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
(16.8 |
) |
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
Facility consolidation and other costs |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
1.6 |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
2.3 |
|
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
1.4 |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
2.0 |
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
0.5 |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
1.3 |
% |
Results of Operations for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 vs. 2008
The following table compares net sales in total and by area of application for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to the prior year quarter (in millions).
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
Area of Application |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
| ||||
|
Residential |
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
$ |
(7.3 |
) |
|
(11.9 |
)% |
|
Recreational Vehicle |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
(82.0 |
) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
73.6 |
|
$ |
98.1 |
|
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
|
(25.0 |
)% |
Gross margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was 16.5% compared to 18.4% in the prior year quarter. The decrease in gross margin percentage is primarily due to adjustments to realizable value on inventory of $1.7 million (2.2% of net sales) due to business conditions primarily related to vehicle seating.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 were 19.6% of net sales compared to 16.8% of net sales in the prior year quarter. This percentage increase is due to under-absorption of fixed costs on the lower sales volume and an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $0.3 million.
During the current quarter the Company recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $0.5 million of employee separation costs due to business conditions.
Operating loss for the current quarter was $2.8 million compared to operating income of $1.5 million in the prior year quarter reflecting the aforementioned factors.
The effective income tax rate was 36.8% and 34.6% in the current and prior year fiscal quarters, respectively. The primary difference between the federal statutory rate and the expected effective rate is the result of state taxes.
The above factors resulted in current quarter net loss of $1.9 million or $0.28 per share, compared to the prior year quarter net income of $0.8 million or $0.13 per share.
All earnings per share amounts are on a diluted basis.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009 vs. 2008
The following table compares net sales in total and by area of application for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to the prior year nine-month period (in millions).
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
| ||||||||
|
Area of Application |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
| ||||
|
Residential |
|
$ |
173.7 |
|
$ |
191.2 |
|
$ |
(17.5 |
) |
|
(9.1 |
)% |
|
Recreational Vehicle |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
(70.0 |
) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
249.6 |
|
$ |
305.0 |
|
$ |
(55.4 |
) |
|
(18.2 |
)% |
Gross margin for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009 was 18.2% compared to 19.6% in the prior year nine-month period. The decrease in gross margin percentage is primarily due to under-utilization of capacity on significantly lower sales volume and the aforementioned $1.7 million adjustment to realizable value on inventory.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were 18.7% compared to 17.3% in the prior year nine-month period. This percentage increase is due to under-absorption of fixed costs on the lower sales volume and an increase in bad debt expense of approximately $0.7 million.
Results for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009 included a pre-tax gain on the sale of securities held for investment of $0.5 million or $0.04 per share after tax. During the current nine-month period the Company recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $2.4 million, or $0.23 per share after tax related to facility consolidation.
Operating loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 was $3.6 million compared to operating income of $7.0 million in the prior year nine-month period reflecting the aforementioned factors.
The effective income tax rate was 36.4% in the current and prior year nine-month periods. The primary difference between the federal statutory rate and the expected effective rate is the result of state taxes.
The above factors resulted in net loss of $2.3 million or $0.35 per share, compared to the prior year nine-month period net income of $3.9 million or $0.59 per share.
All earnings per share amounts are on a diluted basis.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Activities:
Working Capital (current assets less current liabilities) at March 31, 2009 was $87.8 million. Net cash provided by operating activities was $12.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $11.4 million at March 31, 2008. Cash from operating activities was used primarily to reduce borrowings by $12.0 million and pay dividends of $2.0 million. Significant changes in working capital from June 30, 2008 to March 31, 2009 included decreased accounts receivable of $11.6 million, decreased inventory of $9.1 million and decreased accounts payable of $3.8 million. The decrease in receivables is related to lower shipment volume, as well as the timing of shipments to customers and the related payment terms. Inventory decreased $7.4 million due to lower forecasted customer requirements and $1.7 million due to write-downs related to current business environment primarily in vehicle seating applications. The decrease in accounts payable relates to reduced purchase volume based on current demand. The Company expects that due to the nature of our operations that there will be continuing fluctuations in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, and cash flows from operations due to the following: (i) we purchase inventory from overseas suppliers with long lead times and depending on the timing of the delivery of those orders inventory levels can be greatly impacted, and (ii) we have various customers that purchase large quantities of inventory periodically and the timing of those purchases can significantly impact inventory levels, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings. As discussed below, the Company believes it has adequate financing arrangements and access to capital to absorb these fluctuations in operating cash flow.
Investing Activities:
Net cash provided by investing activities was $0.6 million during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009. Proceeds from the sale of investments were $0.7 million. Capital expenditures were $0.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.8 million and $3.4 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company expects that capital expenditures will be less than $0.5 million for the remainder of the 2009 fiscal year.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities was $14.0 million during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2009. Borrowings were lower by $12.0 million primarily due to the reduction in accounts receivable and inventory. Dividends of $2.0 million were paid during the nine-month period.
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company negotiated a refinancing of its working capital line of credit that would have expired June 30, 2009. The Company’s short-term credit facility was increased from $12 million to $15 million and expires June 30, 2010. The long-term credit facility was reduced from $20 million to $10 million and expires September 30, 2011.
The Company pledged accounts receivable and inventory as security under the amended credit facility agreements. The amount of credit available to the Company will be based on eligible accounts receivable and inventory as defined in the amended agreements. At March 31, 2009, the Company had available collateral, as defined by the bank, of $52.9 million with borrowing availability of $25.0 million of which $14.0 million was outstanding. The Company believes that the available credit under the amended agreements is sufficient to support its financing needs.
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to decrease the quarterly dividend from $0.13 per share to $0.05 per share. The action was taken to conserve cash and further strengthen the Company’s balance sheet by reducing debt levels. If the reduced dividend would remain in effect for one full year the result will be annual cash savings of $2.1 million.
In the opinion of management, the Company’s current liquidity and credit resources provide it with the ability to react to opportunities as they arise, to pay quarterly dividends to its shareholders, and to purchase productive capital assets that enhance safety and improve operations. However, should the current economic conditions continue for an extended period of time or deteriorate significantly, we would further evaluate all uses of cash and credit facilities, including the payment of dividends and purchase of capital assets.
Outlook
The consolidation of manufacturing operations that the Company announced on September 10, 2008 was substantially completed as of December 31, 2008. However, workforce reductions have taken place at other facilities as we continue to adjust operations to bring production capacity in line with current and expected demand for our products. Company wide employment has been reduced approximately 30% over the past year.
Demand for our products is dependent on factors such as consumer confidence, affordable housing, reasonably attainable financing and an economy with low levels of unemployment and high levels of disposable income. These factors are all currently in poor positions, and indications are that they will remain that way in the near-term. We are not anticipating significant improvements in market conditions at this time, and are managing our business on that basis.
While we expect that current business conditions will persist for the remainder of calendar year 2009, we remain optimistic that our strategy of a wide range of quality product offerings and price points to the residential, recreational vehicle and commercial markets combined with our conservative approach to business will be rewarded over the longer-term.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
General – Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a financial instrument, derivative or non-derivative, caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. As discussed below, management of the Company does not believe that changes in these factors could cause material fluctuations in the Company’s results of operations or cash flows. The ability to import furniture products can be adversely affected by political issues in the countries where suppliers are located, disruptions associated with shipping distances and negotiations with port employees. Other risks related to furniture product importation include government imposition of regulations and/or quotas; duties and taxes on imports; and significant fluctuation in the value of the U. S. dollar against foreign currencies. Any of these factors could interrupt supply, increase costs and decrease earnings.
Foreign Currency Risk – During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not have sales, purchases, or other expenses denominated in foreign currencies. As such, the Company is not exposed to material market risk associated with currency exchange rates and prices.
Interest Rate Risk – The Company’s primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is changes in interest rates. At March 31, 2009, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in short-term interest rates would decrease annual pre-tax earnings by approximately $40,000, assuming no change in the volume or composition of debt. On March 31, 2009, the Company had effectively fixed the interest rates at 5.0% on approximately $10.0 million of its long-term debt through the use of interest rate swaps. As of March 31, 2009, the cumulative fair value of the swaps is a liability of approximately $0.4 million and is included in other liabilities.
Tariffs – The Company has exposure to actions by governments, including tariffs. Tariffs are a possibility on any imported or exported products.
Inflation – Increased operating costs are reflected in product or services pricing with any limitations on price increases determined by the marketplace. The impact of inflation on the Company has not been significant during the past three years because of the relatively low rates of inflation experienced in the United States. Raw material costs, labor costs and interest rates are important components of costs for the Company. Inflation or other pricing pressures could impact any or all of these components, with a possible adverse effect on our profitability, especially where increases in these costs exceed price increases on finished products. In recent years, the Company has faced strong inflationary and other pricing pressures with respect to steel, fuel and health care costs, which have been partially mitigated by pricing adjustments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”) of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2009 because they are not yet able to conclude that we have remediated the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting identified in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. As of June 30, 2008, our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness is related to the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s material consolidated subsidiary’s reconciliation of accounts payable records to the general ledger.
We have implemented the following remediation steps to address the material weakness discussed above:
|
|
• |
Simplified the account structure surrounding the accounts payable transactions by reducing the number of general ledger accounts used to record accounts payable, |
|
|
• |
Improved the accounts payable reconciliation process by revising the automatic postings to accounts payable, and |
|
|
• |
Enhanced the quarterly management review and approval of the accounts payable reconciliation process with our subsidiary associates. |
We believe these remediation steps will correct the material weakness discussed above. We will assess the effectiveness of our remediation efforts in connection with our management’s tests of internal control over financial reporting in conjunction with our fiscal year 2009 testing procedures. Except as discussed above, we have not identified any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Cautionary Statement Relevant to Forward-Looking Information for the Purpose of “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
The Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements with respect to long-term goals or anticipated results of the Company, including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its reports to stockholders.
Statements, including those in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are not historical or current facts, are “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There are certain important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made herein. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty. Some of the factors that could affect results are the cyclical nature of the furniture industry, the effectiveness of new product introductions and distribution channels, the product mix of sales, pricing pressures, the cost of raw materials and fuel, foreign currency valuations, actions by governments including taxes and tariffs, inflation, the amount of sales generated and the profit margins thereon, competition (both foreign and domestic), changes in interest rates, credit exposure with customers and general economic conditions. For further information regarding these risks and uncertainties, see the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
The Company specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth under Part 1, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
31.1 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32 |
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
May 6, 2009 |
|
By: |
/S/ Timothy E. Hall |
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy E. Hall |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Ronald J. Klosterman, certify that:
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Flexsteel Industries, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: |
|
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit and Ethics Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
Date: |
May 6, 2009 |
|
| |
|
|
|
By: |
| |
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Klosterman | |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Timothy E. Hall, certify that:
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Flexsteel Industries, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: |
|
|
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit and Ethics Committee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
Date: |
May 6, 2009 |
|
| |
|
|
|
By: |
| |
|
|
|
|
Timothy E. Hall | |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION BY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ronald J. Klosterman, Chief Executive Officer, and Timothy E. Hall, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and; |
|
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
Date: |
May 6, 2009 |
|
| |
|
|
|
By: |
| |
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Klosterman | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
By: |
| |
|
|
|
|
Timothy E. Hall | |